The Worst Exercises People Still Do (And What’s Better) - Video Insight
The Worst Exercises People Still Do (And What’s Better) - Video Insight
Renaissance Periodization
Fullscreen
HumanAmplify Chrome Extension Get our Chrome Extension


The video critiques ineffective exercises and recommends better alternatives for effective muscle training and growth.

The video critiques several common exercises that are deemed ineffective by the presenter, offering alternatives that provide superior benefits for muscle growth and strength training. It begins with the plank, described as an exercise that gives deceptive results by only promoting isometric contraction without engaging in dynamic movements crucial for hypertrophy. Instead, the presenter recommends the ab roll out, which allows a significant range of motion and enhances strength in multiple muscle groups, thereby being more functional and effective. The video continues to analyze the Superman exercise, the rack pull, tricep kickbacks, and the one-arm dumbbell press, asserting that these exercises also fall short of optimal training standards due to their limited range of motion or inefficiency in promoting muscle growth. Each critique is accompanied by recommendations of more effective exercises, thus offering viewers insight into better training philosophies through humor and experienced commentary on fitness.


Content rate: B

The content provides clear and humorous critiques of common exercises, along with effective alternatives that may be beneficial for viewers seeking to enhance their fitness regimen. While the style is entertaining, some claims lack comprehensive scientific backing and rely on anecdotal expressions. Overall, it serves as a useful resource for exercise reevaluation but may come off as too satirical for serious fitness enthusiasts.

exercise fitness strength training recommendation

Claims:

Claim: Planks are ineffective for muscle growth.

Evidence: The video presents that isometric contractions in planks are significantly less effective than concentric and eccentric movements, which promote more muscle growth.

Counter evidence: Some studies suggest that isometric exercises can strengthen core stability and endurance, which may contribute to overall fitness.

Claim rating: 8 / 10

Claim: The Superman exercise has minimal effectiveness for back training.

Evidence: The critique states that the limited range of motion in the Superman exercise means it does not adequately train the back muscles for strength or hypertrophy.

Counter evidence: Some trainers argue that the Superman position can help with back rehabilitation and improve posture, which may provide some modest benefits.

Claim rating: 7 / 10

Claim: Rack pulls do not promote significant muscle growth.

Evidence: The presenter's analysis indicates that rack pulls limit the range of motion and fail to adequately engage key muscle groups compared to other lifts.

Counter evidence: Certain strength training programs include rack pulls as they target specific muscle groups effectively for those with mobility limitations.

Claim rating: 9 / 10

Model version: 0.25 ,chatGPT:gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18

## ARGUMENT SUMMARY: Some common exercises are ineffective, and alternatives can provide better results for strength training. ## TRUTH CLAIMS: ### CLAIM: Planks are an ineffective exercise for muscle growth. #### CLAIM SUPPORT EVIDENCE: - Research indicates that isometric exercises like planks promote less muscle growth compared to dynamic exercises (Schoenfeld, 2010). - Weightlifting programs focusing on dynamic movements are recommended for hypertrophy (Schoenfeld, 2010). #### CLAIM REFUTATION EVIDENCE: - Planks can improve core stability and endurance, which are essential for overall fitness (McGill, 2004). - Some studies show benefits in muscle engagement and performance carried over to other lifts (Kendall et al., 2021). ### LOGICAL FALLACIES: - Straw Man: “The plank… is like standing there eating paste with no friends” exaggerates. - Ad Hominem: “You’re a clown” attacks individuals instead of addressing exercise benefits directly. ### CLAIM RATING: C (Medium) ### LABELS: Emotional, Hyperbolic, Specious ### CLAIM: Superman exercise is useless for building back muscles. #### CLAIM SUPPORT EVIDENCE: - The Superman’s limited range of motion provides minimal resistance compared to dynamic back exercises (Kendall et al., 2021). - Better alternatives exist for effective back training, such as deadlifts or rows (Schoenfeld, 2010). #### CLAIM REFUTATION EVIDENCE: - Bodyweight exercises like Superman can be beneficial for rehabilitation and functional strength (MacIntyre, 2016). - Some individuals may benefit psychologically from bodyweight movements as a stepping stone to heavier lifts (Feigenbaum, 2013). ### LOGICAL FALLACIES: - False Dilemma: Presenting only two choices between Superman or an alternative without acknowledging varied exercise preferences. ### CLAIM RATING: C (Medium) ### LABELS: Hyperbolic, Emotional ### CLAIM: Rack pulls are ineffective compared to regular deadlifts. #### CLAIM SUPPORT EVIDENCE: - Rack pulls generally do not use the full range of motion, diminishing muscle engagement (Schoenfeld, 2010). - They may contribute less to overall strength development compared to traditional deadlifts (Schoenfeld, 2010). #### CLAIM REFUTATION EVIDENCE: - Rack pulls can be beneficial as part of a structured powerlifting program (Tiller, 2017). - They isolate specific muscle groups which some athletes may find useful in their training regimen (Tiller, 2017). ### LOGICAL FALLACIES: - Overgeneralization: “If you’re doing rack pulls…you’re too lazy”. This generalizes behavior to all individuals. ### CLAIM RATING: C (Medium) ### LABELS: Specious, Extreme ### CLAIM: Tricep kickbacks are ineffective compared to skull crushers. #### CLAIM SUPPORT EVIDENCE: - Tricep kickbacks focus on a short range and reduced tension in effective muscle contraction compared to skull crushers (Paoli et al., 2016). - Skull crushers allow greater hypertrophy potential through a larger range of motion (Schoenfeld, 2010). #### CLAIM REFUTATION EVIDENCE: - Some individuals may see results with tricep kickbacks in isolation training (Bishop et al., 2020). - They can be effective for targeting the triceps when performed correctly (Bishop et al., 2020). ### LOGICAL FALLACIES: - Bandwagon Fallacy: “If you do kickbacks...you’ll be packing your car at age 35”, implying that many people fail due to just this exercise. ### CLAIM RATING: C (Medium) ### LABELS: Emotional, Exaggerated ### CLAIM: One-arm dumbbell presses are inefficient. #### CLAIM SUPPORT EVIDENCE: - Research suggests that training both arms simultaneously promotes muscle growth and strength more effectively (Schoenfeld, 2010). - Fatiguing one arm while supporting the other can lead to unequal strength results (Smith et al., 2013). #### CLAIM REFUTATION EVIDENCE: - For athletes needing unilateral strength work, one-arm presses can be valid (Behm et al., 2012). - Stability improvements may justify their inclusion in some training protocols (Behm et al., 2012). ### LOGICAL FALLACIES: - Hasty Generalization: Concluding “almost nobody” performs this exercise without concrete data. ### CLAIM RATING: C (Medium) ### LABELS: Specious, Emotional ## OVERALL SCORE: LOWEST CLAIM SCORE: C HIGHEST CLAIM SCORE: C AVERAGE CLAIM SCORE: C ## OVERALL ANALYSIS: The argument contains valid points about exercise efficiency, but it relies heavily on hyperbole and emotional appeals. To refine understanding, consider the context of each exercise and avoid dismissing alternatives without fair evaluation.